Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
3.0
|
Minor bugfixes |
30-Jan-2008 17:05 |
|
3.0rc1
|
Minor bugfixes |
08-Jan-2008 14:30 |
|
2.1.1
|
Major bugfixes |
08-May-2007 14:24 |
|
2.1.0
|
Minor feature enhancements |
13-Feb-2007 15:34 |
|
2.0.9
|
Major bugfixes |
09-Jan-2007 13:56 |
|
2.0.8
|
Minor bugfixes |
23-Oct-2006 17:39 |
|
2.0.7
|
Major feature enhancements |
17-Oct-2006 12:22 |
|
2.0.6
|
Major feature enhancements |
03-May-2006 14:13 |
|
2.0.5
|
Major bugfixes |
21-Mar-2006 17:23 |
|
2.0.4
|
Minor bugfixes |
24-Feb-2006 14:52 |
Comments
[»]
Missing Template Function
by Urb - May 12th 2005 11:45:16
Example applications work find. When I try and use TinyMCE I get an alert
box saying "Could not find template function:
TinyMCE_advanced_getEditorTemplate
any suggestions?
Also, how do you get the editor on the top of the textarea?
--
Urb
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Missing Template Function
by Urb - May 12th 2005 12:54:31
Found the problem with the missing funciton.
Would still like to know how to put the editor on tope of the
textarea,
Thanks
> Also, how do you get the editor on the
> top of the textarea?
--
Urb
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Missing Template Function
by rwwilden - Nov 1st 2005 01:47:59
Could you please share your solution on solving the missing function. I
have the same problem, but have been unable to fix it.
Regards,
Ronald Wildenberg.
> Found the problem with the missing
> funciton.
>
> Would still like to know how to put the
> editor on tope of the textarea,
>
> Thanks
>
> % Also, how do you get the editor on
> the
> % top of the textarea?
>
>
>
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Missing Template Function
by iampivot - Nov 1st 2005 19:11:30
> Could you please share your solution on
> solving the missing function. I have the
> same problem, but have been unable to
> fix it.
I had these problems myself, but only in IE. It turns out tinyMCE is a bit
picky about where it's located. Try removing any tags and specify the
location to tinyMCE using absolute paths. See also
http://www.cmsimple.dk/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10061&sid=33130d57605923e9cb8ad341fdb06156
--
-Tor
[reply]
[top]
[»]
more stable than htmlarea 3
by Samuel Liddicott - Aug 29th 2004 15:47:30
Since I last tried htmlarea 3 a couple of days ago this seems more stable
and the same version works in mozilla and IE, so nice one.
Only gripe is the hundred years it takes to load each button bitmap
individually after onload, and how this messes up firefox browse history
something awful
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: more stable than htmlarea 3
by Moxiecode Systems - Sep 4th 2004 09:02:45
Why it takes long time to load could be that our server is located in
Sweden on a pretty low line. Been thinking of using SF webserver as a
mirror site.
I will look in to the history issue in Firefox.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Cut, Paste in Firefox?
by sgreen - Jun 28th 2004 20:43:05
Great tool; one problem.
I can't get the cut/copy/paste tools to work with
Firefox 0.9. They do work with IE. Using both under WinXP.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Cut, Paste in Firefox?
by Moxiecode Systems - Jun 29th 2004 14:25:17
Hmm, this seems to be due to security reasons in Mozilla and Firefox.
They do have a point, I will remove these icons in the next release. No
need for them anyway, who doesn't know how to user Ctrl+C/P/X. :-)
Check this one for details:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192355
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Very nice!
by afraithe - Mar 12th 2004 04:07:11
Tried it, works great in Mozilla!
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Very nice!
by Krasimir Kazakov - Jun 14th 2004 23:19:25
> Tried it, works great in Mozilla!
It complained about control not focused on firefox / linux,
not working at all in konqueror :(. Sux.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Very nice!
by Moxiecode Systems - Jun 29th 2004 15:01:57
The focus bug was addressed in the latest release. Regarding why it doesn't
work on konqueror, it's simply due to the lack of functionality in that
browser. And Mozilla, Firefox and MSIE is the main focus for this tool, the
day Konqueror and Opera implement the Midas specification I will look in to
these browsers as target platforms aswell.
[reply]
[top]
|
