Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
3.5.7
|
Minor bugfixes |
23-May-2007 04:47 |
|
3.5.6
|
Minor feature enhancements |
26-Jan-2007 13:52 |
|
3.5.5
|
Minor feature enhancements |
22-Oct-2006 21:36 |
|
3.5.4
|
Minor bugfixes |
05-Aug-2006 07:04 |
|
3.5.3
|
Minor feature enhancements |
01-Jun-2006 17:00 |
|
3.5.2
|
Minor bugfixes |
29-Mar-2006 15:54 |
|
3.5.1
|
Major bugfixes |
01-Feb-2006 14:10 |
|
3.5
|
Major feature enhancements |
29-Nov-2005 22:22 |
|
3.4.3
|
Minor bugfixes |
13-Oct-2005 09:58 |
|
3.4.2
|
Minor bugfixes |
28-Jul-2005 15:29 |
Articles referencing this project
- Red Hat: Updated kdegraphics packages fix a security issue
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Sun, Apr 20th 2008 15:20
- Debian: New kdegraphics packages fix arbitrary code execution
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Sun, Nov 25th 2007 07:59
- SuSE: Updates to various xpdf related packages fix remote code execution
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Sun, Nov 18th 2007 13:08
- Red Hat: Updated kdegraphics packages fix a security issue
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Sun, Nov 18th 2007 13:06
- Red Hat: Updated kdelibs packages resolve several security flaws
by Patrick Lenz
,
in Security
Tue, Oct 9th 2007 01:56
|
|
Comments
[»]
great desktop shell but..
by James Pike - Jul 28th 2005 09:32:54
I've switched backwards and forwards between KDE and enlightenment/fluxbox
for a long time now. KDE is a wonderful project and I think it's second to
none in terms of features and integration.
I hope that the 3.4.2 release provides an experience that is not as bug
ridden as the 3.4.1 release. I have considered every release of KDE so far
to be too frustrating to be able to use for any length of time due to
constant program crashes and glitches.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Awesome desktop
by Kilroy - Oct 4th 2004 19:54:47
I usualy swap between kde and fluxbox. I use kde if i want to show off my
system, and i use flux all the rest of the time. kde is good, everything
is integrated so well that it makes it extreamly easy to use. it is also
endlessly configurable, and extreamly easy to do so. i probably would use
kde more if i hadnt had so many problems with it. but all in all i feel it
is a great desktop and has an excelent community and choice of software
--
-=Kilroy=-
[reply]
[top]
[»]
.
by koster11 - Mar 12th 2004 09:38:10
nice. thx
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Why not?
by jlgroce - Nov 26th 2003 11:36:08
Free, and great material. Why not?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
kde is easy to get used to
by 2calvary - Oct 27th 2003 11:53:44
getting used to the look and feel is easy
[reply]
[top]
[»]
!
by nothingnobody - Mar 12th 2003 17:26:57
free is good.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
kde 3
by unixg0at21 - May 25th 2002 01:56:20
kde3 makes windoze xp look like shit and if you dont like it cause its
"heavy" go out and buy a real computer with a little ram and you
should be ok. all the dumb asses who are in love with blackbox run ghetto
computers just buy a decent computer and run kde. blackbox sucks
--
mad cappa
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: kde 3
by Travis Gerspacher - May 30th 2002 01:54:50
> kde3 makes windoze xp look like shit and
> if you dont like it cause its
> "heavy" go out and buy a real
> computer with a little ram and you
> should be ok. all the dumb asses who are
> in love with blackbox run ghetto
> computers just buy a decent computer and
> run kde. blackbox sucks
moron.... plain and simple, or better yet ... Ghetto Moron
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: kde 3
by unix_zealot - Jun 7th 2002 22:26:54
> kde3 makes windoze xp look like shit and
> if you dont like it cause its
> "heavy" go out and buy a real
> computer with a little ram and you
> should be ok. all the dumb asses who are
> in love with blackbox run ghetto
> computers just buy a decent computer and
> run kde. blackbox sucks
I happen to like my ghetto computer. And if you want to run KDE as a
window manager that’s fine with me. But before you start making comments as
to why people run blackbox I would suggest that your read this fine gem of
a book "Design of the Unix Operating System" by Marice J. Bach.
Then you may start to understand why people don't like “all in one
software” (KDE, GNOME...). If you want integrated software then maybe
another platform whose name I won't mention would better suit you.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
KDE ist the best!
by Cinek - Aug 14th 2001 15:04:13
I have installed it everywhere! At work, at home (Intel,Sparc; Linux,
FreeBSD,Solaris) now I feel really good and finally I can work properly. I
simply love it and I am happy about the wide support.
My favourite application is konqueror.
And to you guys, here, quit whinning about the blockheads who are against
KDE. I noticed that most of them only tried some 0.9-beta stuff. And...
shhh... don't tell them that it's good now. It will be our secret...
Hehehehe...
[reply]
[top]
[»]
KDE looks like Windows? So what?
by Bjørn Langfors - Jun 9th 1999 09:42:43
I really don't get this.
Just because KDE looks alot like Windows 9x, many of you geeks
automatically hates it. Why?
Don't get me wrong, I am too sick and tired of Windows 9x, and is today
very pleased with KDE on my Linux box, but I really don't get it when many
of you with GNOME or just console despise KDE, just because it looks like
Windows 9x. What kind of argument is that? It does _not_ function like
Windows 9x, and it looks nice. That's the reasons (I guess) why people use
it.
Winblows isn't ugly. Too bad it sucks.
Ps.: Hey, don't you think it's even more humiliating for Microsoft to
to watch a non-profit organization make a desktop environment so like
Windows 9x and still so much better, than just an OS? ;p
Pps.: Isn't Qt opensource now?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
*sigh*
by gurensan - Feb 27th 2001 20:12:02
How bout some damn patches??? I have src from 2.0.1 ... and I *don't* want
to spend all day downloading on my dialup. A few meg in patches works for
me... and probly just about everyone else who knows how to apply one. I
can't afford the time to download close to 60MB.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: KDE looks like Windows? So what?
by shoftiel - Jan 28th 2003 07:39:34
Besides the menu, you can change the behavior and look of KDE3 easily even
be changed. As far as GNOME, I used it to begin with but you have to use
alot of KDE proggies and has more restriction on what you can change.
> I really don't get this.
> Just because KDE looks alot like Windows
> 9x, many of you geeks automatically
> hates it. Why? i
> Don't get me wrong, I am too sick and
> tired of Windows 9x, and is today very
> pleased with KDE on my Linux box, but I
> really don't get it when many of you
> with GNOME or just console despise KDE,
> just because it looks like Windows 9x.
> What kind of argument is that? It does
> _not_ function like Windows 9x, and it
> looks nice. That's the reasons (I guess)
> why people use it.
> Winblows isn't ugly. Too bad it sucks.
>
> Ps.: Hey, don't you think it's even more
> humiliating for Microsoft to to watch a
> non-profit organization make a desktop
> environment so like Windows 9x and still
> so much better, than just an OS? ;p
>
> Pps.: Isn't Qt opensource now?
--
Thing arent always what they seem.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
KDE is great !!
by Ryan Daniels - Apr 19th 1999 02:57:58
I'd like to take the time to thank all the developers
of KDE and all the KDE Apps. KDE is one of the greatest
things to ever happen to Linux. My computer wouldn't be
the same without it.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
FUD and lies about KDE
by Ashraf Kamal - Apr 18th 1999 10:17:02
I'm a KDE user,I hate windows( no personal reasons) and i've downloaded and
used GNOME. Now I have both KDE and GNOME on my box the two are great but
for now KDE is more stable,usable and feature rich than GNOME. I hope
people will stop attacking KDE how would you feel if you did a lot of work
and give it for free just to see pepole attacking you?. both KDE and GNOME
and any other GUI projects are cornerstones for linux widespread.Love is
sharing if you like Linux share it with others let them know how good it is
and thank both the KDE and GNOME teams for the hard work they've done!
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: FUD and lies about KDE
by integr8er - Mar 29th 2001 13:00:09
First off, I've been doing computers for almost 25 years now and my base
model for comparison is NOT the Windows model (which sucks!). For those of
you that use this as the basis for comparison - well - too bad for you -
someday you'll know better - experience still counts a lot.
My base model is basically CDE - the commercial (stagnant) X environment
that is supplied with most commercial Unixs. Compared to this, KDE is
totally TOP-NOTCH. When I log into a GNOME environment, I find a number of
nice things, but something makes me feel sort of like this is the kids
environment - NO FLAMES PLEASE - I'll readily admit that I do not use Gnome
enough to make a very qualified comment, I acknowledge the many very sharp
people that work in this space and so on, but for KDE, I find it presents a
much more professional feeling and usable environment. If you ever use
xterms with CDE, just the act of resizing the window presents a pain in the
*ss.
As far as I am concerned, KDE is again TOP-NOTCH and those people deserve
the best of recognition. My only problem is that I only have time to
implement the commercial distributions (DISTRO's is a childish and
non-professional term - drop it! - keep Linux and all aspects at a
professional level to move it forward - Please!), so I do not have the
latest version available to me and to download is all too much (sigh). So
I wait, but what I have I KNOW is good stuff.
You KDE developers, keep up the excellent work!!
[reply]
[top]
|
