Branches
Releases
Comments
[»]
3.2.3
by Frédéric L. W. Meunier - Aug 11th 2003 17:00:12
3.2.3 finally compiles with GCC (g++) 3.3.1. 3.2.2 failed with 3.3. Earlier
versions probably failed.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Errors compiling with gcc
by attackc0de - Jun 9th 2002 05:04:57
Most of the errors during compile time with gcc 2.96+
stem from style problems/obfuscation. Ambiguous
'if' statements, uninitialed values, etc..
I spent an hour playing with indent to fix it, nevertheless
a rewrite was indeed needed, and what I eventually did.
--
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
WTF IS THIS SHITE?
by vod - Feb 26th 2001 17:56:27
If anyone needs unrar, don't go here. There are only
windows versions, most things are in .rar format!! wtf am I
supposed to do with a .rar when I don't have unrar?
this is the worst link on fm.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WTF IS THIS SHITE?
by Redhead - Feb 27th 2001 05:45:09
> If anyone needs unrar, don't go here.
> There are only
> windows versions, most things are in
> .rar format!!
hmmm theres one: unraraix.tgz and one unrar-st.lzh, these are defenently
not windows zip or rar formated. But it looks as if those are the ones to
be used in *nix environment..
>wtf am I supposed to do with a .rar when I
> don't have unrar?
But true, it looks as if most of the files were ment to be used in windows
environment.
--
"Don't worry Ma'am. We're university students,
- we know what we're doing."
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WTF IS THIS SHITE?
by Bones0 - Apr 22nd 2001 10:11:23
> If anyone needs unrar, don't go here.
> There are only
> windows versions, most things are in
> .rar format!! wtf am I
> supposed to do with a .rar when I
> don't have unrar?
> this is the worst link on fm.
>
I downloaded the unrar source, extracted it on Windows and compiled it on
Linux -- works fine.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: WTF IS THIS SHITE?
by Jean Delvare - May 18th 2001 04:59:32
> If anyone needs unrar, don't go here.
> There are only
> windows versions, most things are in
> .rar format!! wtf am I
> supposed to do with a .rar when I
> don't have unrar?
> this is the worst link on fm.
There is also unrar250.zip, which contains a binary (which segfaults)
*and* the source code.
Anyway, the source code is really ugly (*.c is included in the main
source, and the Makefile doesn't have the slightest dependency
information.) and the compilation produces more warnings than I could bear.
Definitely, this need complete rewriting.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Where to find unrar
by Damien Curtain - May 25th 2001 22:18:45
Visit http://www.rarsoft.com/download.htm and grab
the current linux version
eg.
http://209.235.4.116/rar/rarlnx28.sfx
--
--
Damien
[reply]
[top]
[»]
This set does indeed work
by PhantomData - Jun 3rd 2001 12:07:48
grab the .zip and compile the source. its going to have alot of source
errors but it works indeed. As proof i just unrar'd a 650 meg linux iso
with no crc errors. so GNYAH!
--
Read the documentation, its been written for a reason!!
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: This set does indeed work
by Christian Hedin - Dec 27th 2001 10:53:19
I found out this link:
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/utils/compress/unrar-2.71.tar.gz
Should work fine.
Ciryon
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: This set does indeed work
by death2tyrants - Jan 22nd 2002 15:28:24
Mac OS X Note:
To compile that link you need to go into the Makefile
and change "CC = gcc" to "CC = cc", also remove "-
Wall" and "-s" options so it will compile/link smoothly.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: This set does indeed work
by sjb1781 - Mar 14th 2002 07:47:54
hi guys, you all seem to know alot about computers but unfortunately i am
just an english engineer!! i wonder if any of you would know what i would
do with a crack that is in the .rar format - i know i have to unrar it but
i have no idea how to, any help on this would be greatly received as i need
to crack SolidWorks 2001+ before i start my final year at university in
sept!!
cheers
sjb
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: This set does indeed work
by sjb1781 - Mar 14th 2002 07:51:13
http://209.235.4.116/rar/rarlnx28.sfx (this is the file) i need to sort
out!!
[reply]
[top]
|
